АНО "Центр Междисциплинарных Исследований Им. С.П. Курдюмова "Сретенский Клуб"
Russian
| English
"Куда идет мир? Каково будущее науки? Как "объять необъятное", получая образование - высшее, среднее, начальное? Как преодолеть "пропасть двух культур" - естественнонаучной и гуманитарной? Как создать и вырастить научную школу? Какова структура нашего познания? Как управлять риском? Можно ли с единой точки зрения взглянуть на проблемы математики и экономики, физики и психологии, компьютерных наук и географии, техники и философии?"

«Сетевые структуры, иерархии и (квази)рынки в биосистемах, человеческом обществе и технических информационных системах
Критерии классификации» 
А.В. Олескин

16.03.2014
Опубликовано в: Сети, когнитивная наука, управление сложностью
  • Kobjakov A., Aver’janov V., Kucherenko V. Russkaja doktrina (Sergievskij proekt) [The Russian doctrine (the Sergiev project), 2005. URL: http://www.rusdoctrina.ru.
  • Leontovich A.A., Marfenin N.N. Vzaimosvjaz’ osnovnyh vnutrikolonial’nyh processov pri vetvlenii u kolonial’nyh gidroidov [The relationships among the main intercolonial processes during the branching of colonial polyps].   Zhurnal obshhei biologii, 1990, vol..51, no. 3, pp..353-362.
  • Marfenin N.N. Fenomen kolonial’nosti [The phenomenon of colony formation]. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU, 1993. — 239 p.
  • Marfenin N.N. Koncepcija modul’noj organizacii v razvitii [The concept of modular organization in developmental terms].  Zhurnal obshhei biologii, 1999, vol. 60, no.1, pp.6–17.
  • Marfenin N.N. Necentralizovannaja samoreguljacija celostnosti kolonial’nyh polipov [Decetralized regulation of the integrity of colonial polyps]. Zhurnal obshhei biologii, 2002, vol. 63, no.1, pp.26–39.
  • Oleskin A.V. Biopolitika (chast’ 1–3). Serija statej  [Biopolitics (Parts 1-3). A series of articles], Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 16 (Biologija), 1994, no.2–4.
  • Oleskin A.V. Setevye struktury obshhestva s tochki zrenija biopolitiki [Network structures in human society from the viewpoint of biopolitics]. Polis, 1998, no.1, pp.68–86.
  • Oleskin A.V. Mezhdisciplinarnye setevye gruppy [Interdisciplinary networked groups]. Vestnnik Rossijskoj Akademii nauk, 1998, no.11, pp.1016–1022.
  • Oleskin A.V. Setevye struktury kak biopoliticheskij proekt [Network structures in terms of a biopolitical project]. Vestnnik Rossijskoj Akademii nauk, 2007, no.12, pp.1084–1088.
  • Oleskin A.V. Biosocial’nost’ odnokletochnyh (na materiale issledovanij prokariot) [The biosocial systems of unicellulars (according to the data obtained with prokaryotes)] Zhurnal obshhei biologii, 2009, vol.70, no.3, pp. 225–238.
  • Oleskin A.V. Setevye struktury v biosistemah i chelovecheskom obshhestve [Network structures in biosystems and human society]. «Che¬lovek v edin¬stve social’¬nyh i biologi¬cheskih ka¬chestv [The human being as a union of social and biological elements]».  Moscow: Librokom, 2011,  pp. 334–348.
  • Oleskin A.V. Setevye struktury v biosistemah i chelovecheskom obshhestve [Network structures in biosystems and human society]. Moscow: URSS, 2012. 304 p.
  • Oleskin A.V. Setevye struktury v biosistemah [Network structures in biosystems]. Zhurnal obshhei biologii, 2013, vol.74, no.1, pp.112-138.
  • Oleskin A.V. Seti kak neierarhicheskie i nerynochnye struktury: realizacija v biologicheskih i social’nyh sistemah [Networks as nonhierarchical and nonmarket structures: their implementation in biological and social systems]. Ekonomicheskie strategii, 2013, no.5, pp.2-7.
  • Pavlov D.S., Kasumjan A.O. Stajnoe povedenie ryb [The shoaling behavior of fish]. Moscoe.: Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universitetta, 2003. 176 p.
  • Pavlova I.B., Levchenko K.M., Bannikova D.A. Atlas morfologii populjacii patogennyh bakterij {An atlas of the morphology of the populations of pathogenic bacteria]. Moscow: Kolos, 2007. — 180 p.
  • Radakov D. V. Stajnost’ ryb kak jekologicheskoe javlenie [Fish shoaling as an ecological phenomenon]. Moscow: Nauka, 1972. 174 p.
  • Reznikova Zh.I., Novgorodova T.A. Raspredelenie rolej i obmen informaciej v rabochih gruppah murav’ev [Role distribution and information exchange in the worker groups of ants]. Uspehi sovremennoj biologii, 1998, vol.118, no.3, pp.345-356.
  • Sumina E.L. Povedenie nitchatyh cianobakterij v laboratornoj kul’ture [The behavior of filamentous cyanobacteria in lab culture]. Mikrobiologija,  2006, vol. 75, no.4, pp.532–537.
  • Fukujama F. Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, 2002. 261 p.
  • Chuchkevich M.M. Osnovy upravlenija setevymi organizacijami [The basic principles of network organization management]. Moscow: Institut sociologii RAN, 1999. 40 p.
  • Shapiro J. A. Bacteria as multicellular organisms. Scientific American, 1988, vol.256, no.6, pp.82-89.
  • Almaas E., Vázquez A., Barabási A.-L. Scale-free networks in biology. «Biological networks. Complex systems and interdisciplinary science. Vol. 3» Singapore, Hackensack (NJ), London: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., 2007, pp.1-21.
  • Appleby M.C. The probability of linearity in hierarchies. Animal Behaviour, 1983, vol.31, pp. 600–608.
  • Archie E.A., Morrison T.A., Foley C.A.H., Moss C.J., Alberts S.C. Dominance rank relationships among wild female African elephants Loxodonta africana. Animal Behaviour, 2006, vol. 71, pp. 117–127.
  • Barabási A.-L. Linked: the new science of networks. New York: Perseus, 2002, 490 p.
  • Barnes J., 1954. Class and committees in a Norwegian island parish. Human Relations, 1954, vol.7, pp.39-58.
  • Ben-Jacob E. Bacterial wisdom. Physica A, 1998, vol..249, pp..553-577.
  • Ben-Jacob E., 2003. Bacterial self-organization: co-enhancement of complexification and adaptability in a dynamic environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Lond. A., 2003, vol. 361, pp. 1283–1312.
  • Ben-Jacob E., Becker I., Shapira Y., Levine H. Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence. Trends Microbiol., 2004, vol. 12, pp. 366–372.
  • Boehm C. Hierarchy in the forest. The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge (MA), London: Harvard University Press, 1999. 292 p.
  • Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G., Johnson J.C. Analyzing social networks. London, Thousand Oaks (CA), New Delhi, Singapore: SAGE Publications, Ltd., 2013, 278 p.
  • Börzel T. Organizing Babylon — on the different conceptions of policy networks. Public Administration, 1998, vol.76, pp. 253–273.
  • Caruso R., Schneider F. Brutality of Jihadist terrorism. A contest theory perspective and empirical evidence in the period 2002–2010. Journal of Policy Modeling, 2013, vol.35, pp.685-696.
  • Castells M. The rise of the network society. The information age: economy, society and culture (Vol. I). Cambridge, MA, Oxford: Blackwell, 1996. 299 p.
  • Castells M. Informationalism, networks, and the network society: a theoretical blueprint. «The Network Society: a Cross-Cultural Perspective». Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2004, pp.3–45.
  • Couzin I.D., Krause J., James R., Ruxton G.D., Franks N.R. Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups.  J. Theor. Biol., 2002, vol. 218,  pp. 1–11.
  • Croft D.P., Krause J., James R. Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) // Proceedings of the Royal Society London B (Biology Letters), 2004, vol. 271, pp. S516–S519.
  • Croft D.P., James R., Ward A.J.W., Botham M.S., Mawdsley D., Krause J. Assortative interaction and social networks in fish. Oecologia, 2005, vol.143, pp. 211–219.
  • Croft D. P., James R., Krause J. Exploring animal social networks. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008. 192 p.
  • Davies A., Gardner B.B., Gardner M.R. Deep South. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1941, 118 p.
  • de Vries H., Stevens J.M.G., Verdaecke H. Measuring and testing the steepness of dominance hierarchies. Animal Behaviour, 2006, vol. 71,  pp. 585–592.
  • de Waal F.B.M. Good-natured. The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press, 1996.  296 p.
  • de Waal F.B.M. The ape and the sushi master: cultural reflections by a primatologist. New York: Basic Books, 2001. 433 p.
  • Devreotes P. Dictyostelium discoideum: a model system for cell-cell interactions in development. Science, 1989, vol.245, pp.1054-1058.
  • Freeman L.C. Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1979, vol.1, pp. 215-239.
  • Freeman L.C., 2004. The development of social network analysis: a study in the sociology of science. Vancouver: Empirical Press, 2004, 208 p.
  • Fuqua W.C., Winans S.C., Greenberg E.P. Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J. Bacteriol., 1994, vol.176, pp. 269–275.
  • Helbing D., Farkas I., Vicsek T. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic. Nature, 2000, vol 407, pp. 487–490.
  • Hill R. A., Bentley R. A., Dunbar R. I. M. Network scaling reveals consistent fractal pattern in hierarchical mammalian societies. Biol. Lett., 2008, vol. 4(6), pp. 748–751.
  • Hölldobler B., Wilson E. O. The superorganism: the beauty, elegance, and strangeness of insect societies. New York: W. W. Norton, 2009. 522 p.
  • Jennings H., 1943. Leadership and isolation: A study of personality in interpersonal relations. New York: Longmans, 1943, 243 p.
  • Kahler M. Networked policies: agencies, power and governance. «Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance». San Diego: Univ. California, 2009a, pp. 1–20.
  • Kahler M. Collective action and clandestine networks: the case of Al Qaeda. «Networked Politics: Agency, Power, and Governance». San Diego: Univ. California, 2009b, pp.103–124.
  • Krebs V.E. Mapping networks of terrorist cells. Connections, 2002, vol. 24, pp.43-52.
  • Krebs V.E. Connecting the dots. Tracking two identified terrorists. 2008. URL: http://orgnet.com/tnet.html.
  • Le Hellaye Y., Goossens B., Jamart A., Curtis D. J. Acquisition of fission-fusion social organization in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) community released into the wild.  Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2010, vol. 64, pp. 349–360.
  • Lusseau D., Newman M.E.J. Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B (Biology Letters), 2004, vol.271, pp.S477-S481.
  • Madden J.R., Drewe J.A., Pearce G.P., Clutton-Block T.H. The social network structure of a wild meerkat population. 2. Intragroup interactions. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2009, vol. 64, pp. 81–95.
  • McCulloch W.S., Pitts W.H. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity.  Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 1943, vol.5, pp. 115–133.
  • Meulemann L. Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks and markets. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag. 2008. 399 p.
  • Moreno J.L., 1932. Applications of the group method to classification. New York: National Committee on Prisons and Prison Labor, 1932,  pp.10-26.
  • Mutzel R. Introduction. Molecular biology, growth and development of the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. Experientia, 1995, vol.51, pp.1103-1110.
  • Newman M.E.J. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 2003, vol. 45,  pp. 167–256.
  • Newman M.E.J. Networks: an introduction. Oxford, New York, Auckland: Oxford University Press, 2012, 772 p.
  • Newman M.E.J., Barabási A.-L., Watts D.J. The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006. 582 p.
  • Oleskin A.V. Making a new case for voluntary cooperation-based fission-fusion structures in human society. Social Sci. Information, 1996, vol.35, pp.619–627.
  • Oleskin A.V., Masters R.D. Biopolitics in Russia: history and prospects for the future. Research in Biopolitics, 1997, vol.5, pp.279–299.
  • Patriquin K. J., Leonard M.L., Broders H.G., Garroway C.J. Do social networks of female long-eared bats vary with reproductive period and age? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2010, vol. 64, pp. 899–913.
  • Powell W.M. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. Res. Organizational Behavior, 1990, vol.12, pp. 295–336.
  • Radcliffe-Brown A.R. The social organization of Australian tribes. Sydney: University of Sydney Oceania Monographs (№ 1), 1930, 108 p.
  • Schmidt-Hempel P. Reproductive competition and the evolution of workload in social insects. American Naturalist, 1990, vol. 135, pp. 501–526.
  • Scott J. Social network analysis: a handbook. London: Sage, 2000. 214 p.
  • Shapiro J.A. The significance of bacterial colony patterns. BioEssays, 1995, vol. 17, pp.597—607.
  • Shapiro J.A. Thinking about bacterial populations as multicellular organisms. Annual Review of Microbiology, 1998, vol. 52, pp.81-104.
  • Simmel G. Soziologie. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, 1908, 222 S.
  • Sumpter D.J.T. The principles of collective animal behaviour. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 2006, vol. 361, pp. 5–22.
  • Thorelli H.B. Networks: between markets and hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal, 1986, vol.7,  pp.37–51.
  • Twin Oaks Intentional Community. 2011. URL: http://www.twinoaks.org.
  • van Alstyne M. The state of network organizations: a survey in three frameworks. 1997. URL: http://ccs.mit.edu/papers/CCSWP192/CCSWP192.html.
  • von Wiese L. Sociology. New York: Oskar Piest, 1941, 198 p.
  • Waters C.M., Bassler B.L. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 2005, vol.21, pp.319–346.
  • Watts D.J. Six degrees: the science of a connected age. New York: Gardner’s Books, 2003, 386 p.
  • Wey T, Blumstein D. T., Shen W, Jordán F. Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Animal Behaviour, 2008, vol. 75, pp. 333–344.

    •  

    [1] Приставка «квази-» возникает, когда мы применяем эту классификацию к биосистемам, техническим системам или тем фазам в развитии человеческого общества, когда рынка как такового нет, но аналогичные конкурентные отношения реализуются.

    [2] Колонна и плеяда у муравьев соответствуют одному одно- или многосекционному муравейнику.

    [3] Автор отдает отчёт в том, что русскоязычный понятийный аппарат для описания сетевых структур ещё не достаточно разработан; мы будем приводить в тексте наши варианты русских терминов вместе с оригинальными английскими терминами.

    [4]Во всех случаях пути названы по принципу {«начальный узел» «промежуточный узел» «конечный узел»}, дополнительно предполагается симметричность рёбер, т. е, скажем, путь 318 считается эквивалентным пути 813.

    [5]Не учитывая пути, связывающие узел сам с собой (например, путь 121).

    Страницы: 1 2 3